Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
GREAT NEWS!!!
#1
I found a methode to run Little Fighter 2 (I use 2.0) with more than
100 Objects!!!

It's quite simple:
Just add another object part into the data.txt:

id: 226 type: 3 file: data\justin_ball.dat
id: 228 type: 3 file: data\julian_ball.dat
id: 229 type: 3 file: data\julian_ball2.dat
<object_end>

<object>
...
<object_end>

Now there are 2 pbject parts, 2 x 100 = 200
So now are 200 objects allowed, in every part 100.[/font]
You can do this as much as you need.
But if there are too much objects the game will get slow...

Just install install a new version of LF2 then.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#2
Duh, in the new update the object limit is 500 >.<".
[Image: doty7Xn.gif]

10 ʏᴇᴀʀs sɪɴᴄᴇ ɪʀᴄ ɢᴏᴏᴅ.ɪ ᴡᴀʟᴋ ᴛʜʀᴏᴜɢʜ ᴛʜᴇ ᴇᴍᴘᴛʏ sᴛʀᴇᴇᴛs ᴛʀʏɪɴɢ ᴛᴏ ᴛʜɪɴᴋ ᴏғ sᴏᴍᴇᴛʜɪɴɢ ᴇʟsᴇ ʙᴜᴛ ᴍʏ ᴘᴀᴛʜ ᴀʟᴡᴀʏs ʟᴇᴀᴅs ᴛᴏ ᴛʜᴇ ɪʀᴄ. ɪ sᴛᴀʀᴇ ᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇ sᴄʀᴇᴇɴ ғᴏʀ ʜᴏᴜʀs ᴀɴᴅ ᴛʀʏ ᴛᴏ sᴜᴍᴍᴏɴ ᴛʜᴇ ɢᴏᴏᴅ ɪʀᴄ. ɪ ᴡᴀᴛᴄʜ ᴏᴛʜᴇʀ ɪʀᴄ ᴄʜᴀɴɴᴇʟs ʙᴜᴛ ɪᴛ ɪs ɴᴏ ɢᴏᴏᴅ. ɪ ᴘᴇsᴛᴇʀ ᴢᴏʀᴛ ᴀɴᴅ ᴛʀʏ ᴛᴏ ʀᴇsɪsᴛ ʜɪs sᴇxɪɴᴇss ʙᴜᴛ ɪᴛ ɪs ᴀʟʟ ᴍᴇᴀɴɪɴɢʟᴇss. ᴛʜᴇ ᴇɴᴅ ɪs ɴᴇᴀʀ.ɪ ᴛʜᴇɴ ᴜsᴜᴀʟʟʏ ʀᴇᴀᴅ sᴏᴍᴇ ᴏʟᴅ ɪʀᴄ ʟᴏɢs ᴀɴᴅ ᴄʀʏ ᴍʏsᴇʟғ ᴛᴏ sʟᴇᴇᴘ.


Reply
Thanks given by: Silverthorn , Drahcir
#3
Well, that's tottaly not new news... (I'm not sure I can say 'news' when they're not new :P )
Reply
Thanks given by:
#4
Yeah in the new version the limit is increased.

And in 1.9 or 1.9c it wont work. I have tryed it once.
Age ratings for movies and games (and similar) have never been a good idea.
One can learn a lot from reinventing wheels.
An unsound argument is not the same as an invalid one.
volatile in C++ does not mean thread-safe.
Do not make APIs unnecessarily asynchronous.
Make C++ operator > again
Trump is an idiot.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#5
in fact, this WAY of using more than 100 objects is new, but the hex method is already well-known :D

edit: @up: oh, then its useless. forget it :p
Reply
Thanks given by:
#6
And good on you for figuring it out;)

I suspect it would work on exceptionally good computers,
(such as yours, I assume) but would cause a crash on not so
good computers (like mine=P).

I haven't yet tried this method, but I'll see when I get time:D
Trust you're all well.
Reply
Thanks given by:




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)